At the beginning of this century the prevailing mentality was assuming that the supposedly complex interactions between people boil down and shape politics in the relevant trading zones to balance conflicting needs and interests. In meetings people work out who is managing who in organizations which determine what it is all about. Their corporate identity is then passed on via the roles its members are assigned to, so that they can be identified, say as the CEO of IBM.

Historically speaking individuals and real people have transformed from potential leaders to conditioned followers of the prevailing trend and thus children, born as originals end up as copies of the conditioning trend, and/or lately as clones of rich people who thus want to preserve their fortune...

The previously created relevance of human being is thus outsourced to benchmarks and in that sense, more and more people are becoming irrelevant in the complex ways of their interactions.

People who just believe in politics with their mentality and justify it with established science and promote it with conventional marketing to be able in turn to manage other people and resources in their image, are stupid: They do no longer see the underlying order of things; they stare at the obvious and it means nothing to them beyond their phraseology.

If trapped in their intellect, people are spoken to, they do not understand, they lose patience and laugh if one tries to help them understand by pointing out the obvious. Some like psychiatrists, however, must listen, it is their job. They are conditioned not to interrupt humans who are sources – such as in the old days, say prophets - and to not put them down, even if they think they are mad.

However, in that mentality professionals do not understand that the obvious, their attitude shines through their mindset conditioned against those who still have eyes to see and ears to hear for themselves.

Collectives, like individuals, thus

However, so much is known even by the non-understandings sciences, that to out rule a higher order in favor of simply assuming that everything evolves out of chaos up to a Social Darwinian process alone, can only be based on lies. And such nice sounding myths have become the basics of and thus the dynamics of postmodern science. It does not lead to an understanding of what is; it limits the mind to the intellects which simply expands in the range which common language allows. Who follows it is limiting him- or herself to political correctness and inhibits the faculty for personally relevant understanding:

More of them same does not do the trick evolutionists claim; even if a blind hen may find a corn!