|
 Why do I, obviously with a
tGGG-approach to BPOCm,
address
this subject personally?
Because that is my way to overcome my
innate mentality
as it became burnt in my
MOS=
mental operating system
in my painfully disappointing reactions to those four
social dimensions Bm, Pm, Om, Cm,
of
 |
Bm=multiplying
boundary conditions which
divide
people’s inner
|
|
Pm=process
responsibility and its dissemination
from the exterior collective
processes so that through
their
|
|
Om=commonly
coordinated object management
they get a chance to rule
them. Depending of the way
|
|
Cm=communication
is multiplied; some people
then become ruler over others for
the surfaced “common good”.
And through their usurped privileges ruling others, through
communication, has become a key value most people live for even if only few
achieve it and only for a while...
|
When confronted with the facts
of life in
their own states of being
in relations to the BPOCm-social
dimensions, people
react in the
prevailing discussions in the collective
in terms of
|
p=putting
each other or the BPOCm-down as a primitive reenactment of what has
preceeded
it,
|
|
T=trapping
each other into an compromise
|
|
t=transcending
each other’s opinions with what should follow in their minds or
|
|
G=opposing
and being against
each other’s BPOCm-opinions.
|
Each of us thus has his or her way
to seek his or her part in the
BPOCm-trend setting.
It is attractive to seeking a lead in
the m=multiplication of the
prevailing B=boundary condition for the trap of the social comfort
zone, the P=process responsibility in it for the common O=object
management, and its C=coordinating communication.
Specifically
in
my
X=essential
9Pr-case
of
|
getting
r=ready
to prepare F9=basic P=processes
such as this one,
|
|
the corresponding
modes of being of me y=seeking
the sufficient minimum required for M=aspiring a maximum, and b=balancing
a S=relaxing defocus
from the remaining problems to recuperate for solutions,
|
|
my mentality
has boiled down to tGGG-approach of
|
|
t=transcending
the ongoing struggles for the
“right” solution and by
G=oppose
everything done by defaulting
to political correctness in its thus already outdated ways
to open the space to implement what works – in my mind...
|
Obviously
in present society the final judge about what works or not seems to
be
some collective, a peer group in science, the citizens in politics and
the consumers in the market place. But how about in terms of
you faced with YOUR
lifefulfillment;
what have you got to say to yourself, and for that mater, to your
Creator?
|