LEAD
TO LIFEFULFILLING
INTERFACES IN COMMON PLATFORMS
BASED ON BUSINESS
CONSTITUTIONS
The fact that the three neuronal systems (stem-, mid-brain and frontal lobes) in our head require an attitude to synchronize its otherwise ongoing power struggle, sets a task for each of us. It depends on his or her innate configuration to contribute to the lifefulfillment of as many as possible, above all that of one's self. The Think-System.ch site reflects the lifefulfilling direction of its author, Dr. Peter Meier; e.g. my GUI=graphical (see where clicking leads you to) user interface to a lifefulfilling platform is as follows:
The author's, e.g. my vt-social competence is in t=thinking how to 3Bw=working out how to communicate life-long meaningfully relevant 3=tangible and socially compatible B=boundary conditions. I thus address the problem of the v=value of 5Ow=caring for each other's lifefulfillment in working out 5=entrepreneurial O=objectives with business constitutions. In order to become effective I point to the symptoms of inadequately caring for each other in 6Ce-encounters such as by taking 6=control in business meetings to work out healing ways of establishing communication. In order to displace those symptoms I use state of the art technologies such as the for personal preparation or in small groups via Internet the MindManager, for supporting meetings in medium size groups, GroupSystems, and for implementation in task force teams, Smart Boards. My focus is on the 4Bw-vision that would result in 4=manageable agreements about the (constitutional) basis to work out the B=operational boundary conditions. As an innate resource, in my 9Pr=need for affection to innate causes, I have access to the 9=basics about how to get ready for lifefulfilling P=processes. In this 4Bw-way my innate competence applied is in F3,4,5,6/9-operational systems that replace science#2-based (rhetoric) systems#2 with personally relevant lifefulfilling platforms based on science#3, Applied Personal Science APS® channeled in the commonly desired direction by a BCM Business Constitutions. Thanks to the concept of APS®-based parameterization briefly outlined above I can turn my system#3 into the Think-Systems.ch business system. Similarly any business can be constitute with one of the 1728 open-ended generative principles, OEGP used to model system#3 that way, using the BCM-procedure. Find out how to deal with the greatest challenge, political correctness... An appropriate interfaceto a lifefulfilling platform gives its participants access to the collective's
When I defaultby giving in to the c3-MOS,
I am other-determined of its outcome in the collective c3-trend as follows:
What remains are all the undealt with symptoms of having taken the initiative at the leading edge of the trend to working out the processes I consider unavoidable to cope with my detriment - and by their irritation I "naturally" become over-sensitive to the reactions of others who feel challenged by my way when its leads beyond their comfort zone. In a c3-context this results in my 6Be-PROBLEM => 3Oe-VISION argumentation: Rather than overcoming my guilt with 6Be-self-refusal to go along with c3 based on C3, thus deregulating the trend, in order to revitalize my life based on my X=being, in the c3-MOS determined state of mind, I would refuse to deal with my guilt and argue for 3Oe: Trying to revert the collective guilt rather than mine, I would c3-suggest my 3Oe-FA>SE= factual approach (FA) to what I consider a success experience (SE). If enough peoplethus close their mind with a c3-MOS, life becomes a closed c4-game consisting of
In short, in this c3-MOS determined state of mind, I
would, in my 6Be-self-refusal in my unavoidable 3Oe-contributions to society
be disappointed by its claims to reengineer the C3-substance towards a c3-world
in men's image. In the
unavoidable c3-discussions with my fellow humans, I would then unavoidably lose my
own C3-substance. In all
the resulting noise the collective's guilt would increase along with mine,
unnoticed by anybody, everybody blaming someone else all condemned to the c4-game's... ...Self-Referentialitywhere the produced Noise in the c3-study#2 of the thus seemingly open c4-games of systems#3, serves system#2 wardens as a pretext to close and the already closed c4-games into mainstream system#2. However, if you are sufficiently c3-rich in the world you may still be tempted to "create" your own world in c3-self-referencing your levels of existence,
instead of fulfilling your life with them, resulting in sin through egocentric hedonism. Specifically you may relate to your emotions that others arouse in you rather than to them, and blame them for the resulting guilt projected on a sacpegoat. This social Darwinian way to privatize the profit and globalize the side effects produces a false sense of recreating yourself for it is at the cost of others, actual and/or in future! And since you thus deny yourself, you are part of those "others", which makes this c3-approach a failure on all accounts! Looked at from the outside, this results in the corresponding intrinsic randomness, noise, that is converging to your self-destruction. To push it away requires all your richness you have acquired from out competing others to
and in the end, all your wealth does not suffice and you end as an empty shell in the last shirt that has no pockets. In other wordsto overcome the closeness of the c4-game, a lifefulfilling platform allows you to fulfill your life instead of wasting in in a meaningless c4-game and it measures your performance between c3-defaulting to the invisible hand of competition and fulfilling your life on the job; a truly lifefulfilling platform does not just promote you, it also challenges you to follow your purpose as your C3-life does it anyway: That is contrary to what systems#2 promises, to let you lead a more simpler life if you default! Let us face it, this promise is just to lure you in so that you can be convinced you to buy into it and by thus increasing your debt increase that of the collective beyond your possibility to repair any of it! Since you death is certain and your competency limits, the vicious circle is closed. Please check out the time frame to which you confine your consideration and you know what kind of problems you are part of... If everybody would jump of Sydney's Harbor Bridge would you jump too? As our university student, you are asked for a corresponding feedback to get the parameters of your interface and its default... |