2Bm-§2) Specifically I am sure you agree with me that the operational B-rules should account for the y=minimal requirements for YOUR lifefulfillment as well as mine and for as many as possible. You might not see, what can be done about it, because your requirement for your Bm-interface is probably different. 2Be-§3) So be informed that I am c-qualified and determined to t=transcend the actually Bm-multiplied boundary conditions to that end, e.g. so that your interface can be worked out and made understandable as well. I 2Bm-do this in the niche of play and aimlessness by reducing the redundancy of the prevailing Bm and make them transparent for redesign. For that purpose I have the concepts for the corresponding mental management available. With it everybody concerned can begin with bringing his or her MOS mental operating system in order with his personally relevant law of lifefulfillment. This approach of mine with my 9Pv-OEGP is in itself seen as critical Tp-decision making for others who first see the quality of 2Bm rather than what I do with with my y, and what it means to me with reference my knowledge work#3. I am focusing on t-transcending the 2Bm-aimlessness with what allows me to be able to be G-against the Be-established science#2 in its sumptuousness and usurpation of definition power with a viable alternative: 2Bm must be put in the service of the lifefulfillment of those concerned (§2) and 2Be must provide them with interfaces on lifefulfilling platforms (§3) so that actually as many as possible have are supported in fulfilling their lives. In short, lifefulfillment requires deregulation of system#2 through one's Bm-interface so that at least one's fellow humans allow a mental space for revitalizing one's MOS from c3 to C3 in order to became a blessing in one's community with them in thus fulfilling one's life. Where system#2 overwrites this basic human need, it becomes closed and thereby eventually self-destructive, sucking with it all those who depend on it, having defaulted to it. Do I need to point to the crashes of the stock exchange and more tangible human catastrophes for you to understand the need for the deregulation of thinking-catastrophes?
|